. 3. g. File-systems tested on the NVMe SSD included Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, XFS, and NTFS. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. I think in many ways btrfs is the better filesystem, but I seem to have noticed that it takes longer to copy data than on ext4. To add a block device to a Btrfs volume, use the btrfs device add and btrfs filesystem balance commands. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. Btrfs is a bit slower with writes because of its Copy-on-write nature, but just as fast when it comes to reads. It can create, diff and restore snapshots and provides timelined auto-snapping. XFS A number of Phoronix readers have been asking about some fresh file-system comparisons on recent kernels. ZFS ain't bad, but this whole btrfs data loss myth needs to stop. . In this Video we are going to cover Linux File System Types - Ext2,Ext3,Ext4,XFS,BTRFS | Linux File Systems Explained | Linux Tutorial for Beginners #linuxt. 0 NVMe SSD was used for the benchmarking of these file-systems in different desktop use-cases. Vide. My home file share runs zol because I prefer zfs to btrfs and run it at work a lot so I'm much more comfortable with it. There was a higher risk than upon disconnection or loss of power than some of the files are truncated. XFS is about as mainline as a non-ext filesystem gets under Linux. In today's video, we will talk about the 4 Major Linux File Systems. Another point against btrfs is the insane amount of memory it uses. The PostgreSQL database server ran well particularly on EXT4 and XFS while F2FS on the USB 3. Comparison of archive formats. The only issue with it is that its built-in RAID 5/6 functionality is still not usable and can lead to data loss. Difference between Ext4 vs Btrfs filesystems on Linux. Never use ReiserFS on a new system and if you are currently using it, consider converting it to XFS or Btrfs. ) XFS. 3. Many options exist for file systems including Ext2/3/4, Btrfs, etc. Ext4文件系统是Ext3的继承者，是Linux下的主流文件系统。经过多年的发展，它是目前最稳定的文件系统之一。但是，老实说，与其他Linux文件系统相比，它并不是最好的Linux文件系统。 在XFS vs Ext4方面，XFS在以下几个方面优于Ext4： After a week of testing Btrfs on my laptop, I can conclude that there is a noticeable performance penalty vs Ext4 or XFS. BTRFS's problems are exaggerated, and depending on your use case may fit better than ZFS. On the NVMe SSD, the four-thread FS-Mark was the fastest on XFS followed by Btrfs. Si su aplicación falla con números de inodo grandes, monte el sistema de archivos XFS con la opción -o inode32 para imponer números de inodo inferiores a 232. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. org's git. But not enough users follow the guide on and instead do stuff that actually makes the system worse. ext4 ファイルシステムは、2 32 個を超える inode をサポートしません。 XFS は inode を動的に割り当てます。It provides a basic Unix- like file system for Linux, using virtual directories to handle physical devices, and storing data in fixed-length blocks on the physical devices. だが、Linux 5. One thing that seems to be true for BTRFS in all three articles… For whatever reason it seems to be much slower initially starting up stuff, eg during a boot and launching an application, but otherwise can perform well. XFS back then was buggy and error-prone, to say the least. All have pros and cons. For these reasons, Fedora has made BTRFS the standard filesystem in their newer releases. It provides an unlimited subdirectory. Phoronix: Linux 5. Linux 5. Things like snapshots, copy-on-write, checksums and more. So for a large video collection, I think I will stick with ext4 still. . Stackable file. ZoL Performance, Ubuntu ZFS On Linux Reference Storage : 2019-04-24: Linux 5. which btw you should put in here then as well. Probably those edge cases are not visible on an external USB hard drive, could be visible with external SSDs on a USB3. LVM has snapshots. Abstract and Figures. Though EXT4 has few strong capabilities, it is reliable and well-maintained across all Linux operating systems. By far, XFS can handle large data better than any other filesystem on this list and do it reliably too. NTFS. both are great choices, but for me the more generally useful choice is BTRFS. As I have mentioned earlier, snapshots are created with minimal size due to the use of copy-on-write. 7. Furthermore, the Ext4 is designed to be backward compatible. Thanks. Regarding boot drives : Use enterprise grade SSDs, do not use low budget commercial grade equipment. 另外，我们常说的file对象，它用于关联进程和dentry对象的. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4,Sure, BtrFS has its benefits and novel features, but "has never once failed me in 10+ years" is an incredibly strong reliability trend that I'd be hesitant to trade for those, especially in a piece of my infrastructure where a single failure could potentially cause massive loss of data and subsequent time spent recovering from backups/etc. Rationale is native Linux nature, vs xfs being Linux supported. 0 unterstützt. This feature allows for increased capacity and reliability. BTRFS hatte auch etwas höhere Latenz als EXT4, was bedeutet, dass es länger dauerte, bis Dateien auf dem Dateisystem zugegriffen werden konnten. 6,861. Snapraid says if the disk size is below 16TB there are no limitations, if above 16TB the parity drive has to be XFS because the parity is a single file and EXT4 has a file size limit of 16TB. 7. For storage, XFS is great and sometimes has higher performance than EXT4. 1 interface. EXT4 being the “safer” choice of the two, it is by the most commonly used FS in linux based systems, and most applications are developed and tested on EXT4. Ability to create large volumes of up to 1 PB 1. I currently have a ds1819+, currently, i have 8 x 4tb (5400rpm) 32G of ram 2x2tb nvme cachethe system is super fragmented and super slow synology says that i need to backup everything and recreate the volume. For reducing the size of a filesystem, there are two purported wats forward, according to xfs developers. Both are good file systems. 3. 2 SSD as yesterday's testing and using the same 4. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. , power failure) could be acceptable. 0 X. Complementing the benchmarks from yesterday are some more results today with Bcachefs compared to EXT4, Btrfs, XFS, and F2FS with testing being done from the same Intel M. List of archive formats. BTW, transparent compression can offset much of the performance penalty between using a fs like btrfs or ZFS and a more traditional fs like ext4 or xfs, depending on your workload. g. BTRFS claims to offer a lot (data-loss resiliency, self-healing if RAID, checksumming of metadata and data, compression, snapshots). That is according to my quick read of various Phoronix tests. With Bcachefs on its trek towards the mainline Linux kernel, this week I conducted some benchmarks using the very latest Bcachefs file-system code and compared its performance to the mainline Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system competitors on both rotating and solid-state storage. Tenga en cuenta que el uso de inode32 no afecta a los inodos que ya están asignados con números de 64 bits. 和 ext4 和 XFS 一起使用的工具比较 法律通告 Settings Close. My recommendation of that list would be XFS. He Installed Linux and partitioned his partition in Ext4 but Hardly after a month he screwed. Through many years of development, it is one of the most stable file systems. Zu diesen gehören eine integrierte RAID-Funktionalität, ein inkludierter Volume Manager und die Unterstützung von Dateisystemen bis 16EiB. e. Comparison of file archivers. Note that everything with LVM is at the block level which has major limitations. 我们主要讨论Linux中主流的三个文件系统：Ext4、XFS以及Btrfs的功能特点 ext4 文件系统由 ext3 文件系统改进而来，而后者又是从 ext2 文件系统改进而来。 虽然 ext4 文件系统已经非常稳定，是过去几年中绝大部分发行版的默认选择，但它是基于陈旧的代码开发而来。I've compiled in tmpfs for over a decade now. What takes up space is each consecutive data change, that is why snapshots are created instantaneously. - Linux Kernel 5. In fact, BTRFS is also a copy-on-write system to support fault tolerance and file recovery, and provides easy management. Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. However, to be honest, it’s not the best Linux file system comparing to other Linux file systems. Even after then I was able to transfer data out of the filesystem. That however would disable a lot of the Btrfs features. For a consumer it depends a little on what your expectations are. User quotas for each shared folder. 0 File-System Benchmarks: Btrfs vs. Each of the five file-systems were tested on the same NVM Express SSD from the Linux 4. Regardless what I'm doing the maximum transferrate (write) is between 40-60MB on ZFS. That XFS performs best on fast storage and better hardware allowing more parallelism was my conclusion too. ZFS on FreeBSD may be faster than BTRFS on Linux. I heard BRTFS filesystem with continuous trim and unit allocation size of 64kb are the best configs so far. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example:8. ago. 3. /etc/fstab /dev/sda5 / ext4 defaults,noatime 0 1 Doing so breaks applications that rely on access time, see fstab#atime options for possible solutions. Ext4 provides more flexibility in terms of data storage. ago. 4 HDD RAID performance per his request with Btrfs, EXT4, and XFS while using consumer HDDs and an AMD Ryzen APU setup that could work out for a NAS type low-power system for anyone else that may be interested. That was many years ago, perhaps when btrfs was less ready. However, if you are looking for a. Log in • Sign up. If you see errors, you’ll likely need more free space. I don’t think any vendor will support ZFS unless Oracle fixes the license. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. It supports all. Better for gaming, my money is on ZFS if you have extra RAM to spare and restrict the cache size. Hey guys, I’m also in this quest of finding out the best configs for the temp drives. They both use delayed allocation to achieve file. Btrfs was 107% faster in initial read scores and 24% faster in initial write scores. Ext4 is the fourth version of the Ext(Extended) File System for Linux and is probably the most well-known file system for Linux out there. are two different decisions you have to make. XFS still has some reliability issues, but could be good for a large data store where speed matters but rare data loss (e. This is useful, though far less complete than the block-by-block checksums of btrfs and ZFS. Được tích hợp vô hệ thống DSM Synology , do NAS có hiệu xuất làm việc cao trong vấn đề lưu trữ và khôi phục, Btrfs hoạt động trên NAS. Compare Btrfs vs ZFS and 17 other options side by side to learn "What are the best file systems?" Introducing . After deciding to use LVM2 as volumemanager on our servers there was also the wish for an online resizeable filesystem. You can hot swap drives without rebooting, remove failed drives, swap in a larger drive and remove the smaller one, all without preparing ahead of time to do so. I have fsck enabled via fstab and it checked the fs at boot (Last checked: Thu Nov 4 07:58:57 2021) which maybe took 5 - 10 minutes, did not stop exact time though. While looking at the filesystem options it seems like BTRFS is a lot more stable than it was the last time I had to install arch so now I am seriously considering using it. Out of curiosity I have tried BTRFS (still unstable so I can't really expect to be able to use it) and noticed that the read speed is about 150% of ext4 - while write speed. Starting with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7. Ext4 was designed with spinning drives in mind but as SSDs are fundamentally different, an SSD optimized file system can help. 2. ZFS brings robustness and stability, while it avoids the corruption of large files. F2FS vs. EXT4 and XFS show similarities in some features. We see that on the SMR disk btrfs has most of the advantage on overall ops that it has on ext4, but penalty on random appends is not as dramatic as a ratio. A Seagate FireCuda 520 PCIe 4. Da Btrfs sehr leistungshungriger ist, benötigen NAS-Systeme dafür einen starken Prozessor und ausreichend Arbeitsspeicher. 7 - EXT4 vs. also XFS has been recommended by many for MySQL/MariaDB for some time. You might also want to consider Btrfs for your array drives, but you should be aware of the potential risks. However, BTRFS had significantly better performance with small files than EXT4. Btrfs vs. So now I can boot up into a snapshot. Btrfs removes duplicate data from disk directly while Ext4 cannot do that, ext4. Quota journaling: This avoids the need for lengthy quota consistency checks after a crash. We may have lengthy talk on ext vs XFS vs f2fs and btrfs vs zfs and there are many more points to be mentioned, but for regular users. "Open-source" is the primary reason people pick Btrfs over the competition. Xfs is very opinionated as filesystems go. XFS vs. And generally, files that arent compressible, wont be forcefully compressed. EXT4 vs. Users are encouraged to read the Btrfs article for more info. We are considering between Linux ZFS and Btrfs. Regarding filesystems. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux kernel since 2001 and offers high performance for large filesystems and high degrees of concurrency (i. The Backend/Frontend separation is clean and shardmap is clever. Linux 5. The EXT4 f ile system is 48-bit with a maximum file size of 1 exbibyte, depending on the host operating system. 4. For the adventurous: you can define block devices on btrfs and use ext4 on those block devices (ext4 on btrfs). Hey Guys! Welcome to XPSTECH. As cotas XFS não são uma opção remountable. Example 2: ZFS has licensing issues to Distribution-wide support is spotty. So if you are after the most speed for the buck and if your NAS is already doing RAID 5 or more, you could go for Ext4. As far as I know (please someone correct me), ZFS needs equally sized drives to work, BTRFS can handle differently sized drives. In a significant data corruption, Ext2 and Ext3 file systems are more possible and easy to recover data due to their data redundancy compared with Ext4. Ext4 is probably the final evolution of the ext filesystem (which started with ext, then ext2, ext3, and now ext4). EXT4 lacks more robust features but is stable and well-supported on all Linux operating systems. In Windows NTFS is used, while in Mac OS it is HFS, perhaps these will sound familiar to you, especially the typical FAT or its variants for. Mar 14, 2012. I remember being on ext4 using Timeshift but it only supports rsync–so slow. I don't know anything about XFS (I thought unRaid was entirely btrfs before this thread) ZFS is pretty reliable and very mature. Here are a few other differences: Features: Btrfs has more advanced features, such as snapshots, data integrity checks, and built-in RAID support. 특히 시놀로지에서는 데이터 보호와 백업의 용이함을 장점으로 내세운 Btrfs를 권장합니다. 0 SSD drive used was a 250GB Samsung 850 PRO solid-state drive connected both via SATA. When space gets low, Btrfs automatically expands the volume in chunks of roughly 1 GB. 2. Is XFS better than btrfs? September 30, 2023 by Garry. Ability to shrink filesystem. XFS and btrfs are two advanced file systems for Linux that offer significant improvements over ext4. But it's slow when used with fsync -intensive programs such as dpkg (I know eatmydata and the crappy apt-btrfs-snapshot programs) and I won't setup a. btrfs seems to write more data to a disk than ext4. checksum verification on each file. Ext3, or Ext4) to the Btrfs file system using the btrfs-convert tool. This article provides a detailed comparison of XFS vs btrfs to help you determine which file system is a better fit for your use case. Btrfs would be adding features you most likely don't need. I am using this: NTFS Windows C: + NTFS Windows D: (all data) + EXT4 Linux /. I've also heard that LVM snapshots can. Btrfs El sistema de archivos Btrfs nació como sucesor natural de EXT4, su objetivo es sustituirlo eliminando el mayor número de sus limitaciones, sobre todo lo referido al tamaño. , not available on the GUI for now) that allows choosing a file system from a white list, defaulting to ext4. Ext4. 2. xfs/. I'm not asking "What is the best filesystem?"—There is no such thing as 'the. Granted, i just use the automatic partition creater at setup, so it still uses ext4 for the /boot and /boot/efi partitions. What is the difference between the two file systems, Btrfs and EXT4? This tutorial covers a detailed comparison and a practical tip for you. And BRTFS has some really nice features in that area. Otherwise use BTRFS. While I have used btrfs balanced, timeshift and my other develop tool scripts for managing borg backups rely a lot on standard linux file. For SSDs, F2FS really is a hands down winner still, although EXT4 and XFS are catching up, they still lose. In the time since I chose ext4 for these systems, btrfs seems to have come a long way, so the choice may be harder today. ago. Without going too technical, if you want to have easy system backups so that you can revert to if an update breaks the system, then btrfs. Yes Ext4 is much easier to setup but BTRFS has its advantages. As others have said, btrfs is newer and offers a few advanced features for backups (snapshots) and data integrity. OpenSUSE hiện sử dụng btrfs làm tùy chọn mặc định cho phân vùng /root, nơi đặt hệ điều hành. freebird54 September 21, 2021, 2:58pm 10. For single disks over 4T, I would consider xfs over zfs or ext4. However, we also must admit that Btrfs has many advantages that Ext4 doesn’t have, for example: 8. EXT4 has been the Linux default since 2006, following the previous EXT3. . Block sub-allocation and Tail packing. This is the first time that the new EXT4 and Btrfs and NILFS2 filesystems have been directly compared when it comes to their disk performance though the results may surprise. You can, however, still use NTFS for storing non-OS and application-related files. More uniquely, checksumming can detect errors in the data itself. Hi, I think BTRFS is actually faster then ZFS on Linux. Stratis is no where near ready for version 1. For pure data storage, however, the btrfs is the winner over the ext4, but time still will tell. Fuck writes blocking reads. EXT4 vs. In Summary, ZFS, by contrast with EXT4, offers nearly unlimited capacity for data and metadata storage. We will determine which one is the best ZFS, BTRFS, and EXT4. btrfs 可以支援 snapshot, 但 ext4 不行, 如果一開始就採用 ext4, 日後如果要使用 snapshot 功能, 必須將 NAS 的資料備份出來, 重新 format 成 btrfs 格式. . - Tạo và lưu trữ snapshot. 240GB SSD formatted as EXT4 for main OS. because it spans multiple partitions, it's less likely to fill up your hard drive. Page 2 of 2. A：BTRFS系能最差，不到20 seeks/sec. EXT4は、Linuxベースのオペレーティングシステムのメインファイルシステムです。zfs or btrfs or ext4. (For example, you might have an ext4 root filesystem, but store most of your data on a zfs or btrfs pool. Guys, the main reason why I want to use btrfs is way better speed in/at/on 4k block size. However, I was using the openSUSE's default partition layout, which is btrfs for / and xfs for /home. It can store large files and has advanced features as compared to Ext2 and Ext3. 04 Disco Dingo was running on the Threadripper setup while using the Linux Git kernel from the mainline PPA. But. As Microsoft makes more progress with ReFS on Windows 11, Linux is also getting performance optimizations and improvements on some of its major file systems, namely, F2FS, Btrfs, and EXT4. So please enlighten me, where is btrfs better and where is it worse or just significantly different than ZFS. A file system controls where, how, and when data is stored and retrieved from a storage device. The Slant team built an AI & it’s awesome Find the best product instantly. If you want to see how Bcachefs compares to. Hi there, I‘m thinking of changing my filesystem from ext4 to btrfs, as I have read a lot of positive things about it online. 356 Btrfs—short for "B-Tree File System" and frequently pronounced "butter" or "butter eff ess"—is the most advanced filesystem present in the mainline Linux kernel. $ sudo su - # fsck. But to be honest, it might be easier for me to work around than the lack of the possibility for single-file clone that btrfs, XFS etc. ago. windows and linux use one big D: for data storage, NTFS C: and EXT4 Linux are only for OS and software. 00GHz (8 Cores) MSI C236A WORKSTATION (MS-7998) v1. 3 which makes XFS v5 the default and all the benefits it brings. BTRFS has a number of issues with optimizations (mostly minor) and Problems with Scrubbing and Raid56. Features of the XFS and ZFS. Windows users don’t have much of a choice regarding a file system. Both ext4 and XFS should be able to handle it. A. Depends on what you're looking for. BtrFS looked promising, but last I checked it still couldn't be trusted in RAID modes. Supported LBA Sizes (NSID 0x1) Id Fmt Data Metadt Rel_Perf 0 - 512 0 2 1. 29 release of the Linux kernel. Downside is that it's a slower file system due to it's nature of redundancy. It's got good features. If you think that you need the advanced features. Yeah reflink support only became a thing as of v10 prior to that there was no linux repo support. That being said, it is meant as a temporary solution to migrate data to a native Unix file system, such as ZFS or UFS. Btrfs was developed specifically to facilitate quick administration and maintenance. Use XFS for your array drives and Btrfs for your cache pool. Just so perfect to roll back for some games and modding. In the end I use ext4 as trustworthy frontend, and btrfs as a unreliable backup. A File system is one of the most important aspects that af. And I don't know if btrfs is right thing for my server. Each of the tested file-systems were carried out with the default mount options in an out-of-the-box manner. The only time there were issues was when my RAM sticks went bad and btrfs detected it and put my FS into read-only mode to prevent corruption. Guess it depends on the scenario. With the comparison table out of the way, let’s get right into it! Ext4 Overview. I have a raid 1 setup on dual 3. It is destined to be replaced by Btrfs as the default Linux filesystem. Not only does both file systems feature a more robust data assurances then XFS (the mature fsck for Ext4 and checksums and data. In some areas Btrfs was showing great improvements in performance, especially for the RAID setup, but it still lacked in some other areas. EXT4 vs. - Tính năng tự khôi phục tập tin. If you're looking to warehouse big blobs of data or lots of archive and reporting; then by all means ZFS is a great choice. The 3 types of file systems support large file size and volume size. Linux 5. My current setup is /@ for the rootfs, /@home for home dir, works great. An efficient file system is necessary for everyday system processes. ^ Microsoft first introduced FAT32 in MS-DOS 7. ago. It was also 164% faster in post-snapshot reads and 17% faster in post-snapshot writes. a lot of btrfs' perception of 'breaking' is actually due to checksums (correctly) finding fault on a users data and (correctly) not allowing mounting of the filesystem until it's fixed. removes the need for LVM and thus eliminates 1 layer for filesystem-ing (if that’s a word) On top of that, in 2008, the principal developer of EXT3 and. . As it. Ext4 is more mature, whereas Btrfs has features that should allow for greater resilience (and, in theory, should make it less susceptible to data corruption). Both timeshift and borg write to it. Share. could go with btrfs even though it's still in beta and not recommended for production yet. Setting up a vdev with one disk just to get snapshots and checksums seems. The XFS File System. Notes[ edit] ^ IBM introduced JFS with the initial release of AIX OS/2 Warp. EXT4 is better in the general case. The flexibility of ext4 and BTRFS in that you can easily resize them is way too important to give up. Till the moment, the ext4 seems to be a better choice on the desktop system since it is presented as a default file system, as well as it is faster than the btrfs when transferring files. This section highlights the differences when using or administering an XFS file system. Personally I run btrfs on all my Linux devices, some of them with half-decade old installations of Arch and they've all performed admirably. BTRFS is newer, and the performance is not as good in many cases, but it is not far off. EDIT 1: Added that BTRFS is the default filesystem for Red Hat but only on Fedora. However, when we review EXT4 vs BTRFS, here’s the downside: BTRFS has disk and volume management built-in, while EXT4 is a “pure filesystem”. Squid mentioned above that we can create a . Moreover, the ext4 is more beneficial when the. F2FS vs. El ext4 y xf. Thanks 😊. 7 star rating. Yes, both BTRFS and ZFS have advanced features that are missing in EXT4. I see that it says multiple btrfs snapshots are not supported. The thing is I'm putting /home in a separate HDD. Find a motherboard with enough drive ports or real sata controllers to run all the drives. Btrfs may be better for large servers. The first command looks like this: dd if=/dev/zero of=file-sparse bs=1 count=0 seek=2G. I am getting too many input/output errors with my 3TB HDD NTFS hard disk for main files. Btrfs is the recommended file system to use in most scenarios. というのをベースにするとXFSが良い。 一般的にlinuxのブロックサイズは4kなので、xfsのほうが良さそう。 MySQLでページサイズ大きめならext4でもよい。xfsだとブロックサイズが大きくなるにつれて遅くなってる傾向が見える。 BTRFS is the latest file system we present, and began development in 2007 by Oracle Corporation as a replacement for EXT4. petronasAMG77 • 1 yr. BTRFS has better backup capabilities, but is considered less stable, despite it working for me just fine with my testing of it. With ZFS ZVOLs, you can run other file systems like ext4 or xfs for special situations (like as storage for VMs) and still get snapshots/block checksumming. 하지만 리소스 문제나 호환성 등을 생각한다면 EXT4도 포기할 수 없죠. Tbh, it depends on game by game basis Team Fortress 2 will go as low as nearly 50%, same for KSP. file-system comparison, here are some fresh benchmarks looking at the Btrfs, EXT4, F2FS, and XFS file-system benchmarks on a speedy WD_BLACK SN850 NVMe solid-state drive. But shrinking is no problem for ext4 or btrfs. Hi I never worry about it… my latest SSD SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB has a 10 (limited) year 50GB a day warranty, Have OCZ’s with thousands of hours running btrfs all running fine. However benchmarks test quite narrow parameters which may not be reflected by running an OS. However we have a new contender - ZFS performed *extremely* well on the. Find out which file system suits your needs best. Also BRTFS compresses the file system using less space compared to EXT4 but again the tradeoff is it uses more computer. Es un sistema de archivos actualizado y también fiable. I've heard good things about BTRFS, and I'd use XFS but I dislike that it takes an significant % of the free-space off the bat. Btrfs Benchmarks comparison, here is a wider look at mainline file-systems on the Linux 4. The major difference between ext4 and XFS file systems is that the ext4 file system works better for fewer size files (single write/read thread) while the XFS works more efficiently for larger files (multiple read/write threads). BTRFS bietet, mal abgesehen von der Möglichkeit einer Inline Deduplizierung, beinahe alle Features von ZFS. For a future article will be a look at non-mainlined file-systems,. BTRFS was clearly in the lead when considering Documents – even better than ZFS with deduplication. Next we will need to rebuild grub, first mount the EFI folder (in our case its /dev/sda1) mount -t auto /dev/sda1 /efi. Januar 2020. To organize that data, ZFS uses a flexible tree in which each new system is a child. FUSE-based file systems. It's a 64-bit, journaling filesystem that has been built into the Linux. ext4 and xfs are probably the best fs' to lay over a single disk (and even on raid device if you're familiar with mdraid). When use btrfs it's 35-40 MB/s.